Recent policy changes made by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) have shifted the dynamics of buyer’s agent compensation, prompting sellers to reconsider their strategies.

Many buyers, especially first-time homebuyers, have limited savings and may struggle to cover additional costs beyond the down payment, closing costs, and other expenses associated with purchasing a home. Mortgage lenders typically do not allow buyers to include agent fees in their loan amount, meaning buyers must pay these fees out-of-pocket, which can be a significant financial burden.

Requiring buyers to cover their agent’s compensation, as opposed to the traditional seller-offered model, exacerbates affordability issues and limits many buyers’ ability to purchase a home. To maximize market appeal and facilitate a quicker sale at full market value, sellers should strongly consider offering buyer’s agent compensation.

1. Increased Buyer Pool: Offering compensation to buyer’s agents can attract more potential buyers. Many buyers rely on agents to navigate the home-buying process, and agents are more likely to show homes where they are compensated, expanding the pool of potential buyers for the seller’s home.
2. Competitive Advantage: In a competitive real estate market, offering buyer’s agent compensation can make a seller’s property stand out compared to similar listings that do not offer such incentives. This could lead to quicker sales and potentially higher offers.
3. Facilitated Negotiations: Providing compensation can simplify negotiations. Without the need for buyers to negotiate agent fees separately, the transaction process becomes more straightforward, reducing potential friction points that could delay or derail a sale.
4. Legal and Compliance Benefits: Buyer agents help ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements during real estate transactions. By compensating buyer agents, sellers can mitigate the risk of non-compliance and potential litigation, which could arise from handling complex paperwork and disclosures on their own.
5. Market Perception: Not offering buyer’s agent compensation might create a perception that the seller is less flexible or cooperative, which could deter potential buyers and their agents. This perception can be particularly detrimental in markets where such compensation is customary.
6. Preservation of Market Norms: While the NAR settlement allows for commission negotiations, many buyers and sellers are accustomed to the traditional model where sellers offer compensation to buyer’s agents. Deviating from this norm might confuse or alienate potential buyers, affecting the property’s marketability.

Sellers who choose to offer buyer’s agent compensation can enhance their property’s appeal and attract a wider range of buyers resulting in obtaining the highest price, in the shortest time, with the fewest problems. In a competitive market, this strategic decision may be crucial for achieving a successful and timely sale.