Single-family rentals (SFRs) are established as a compelling investment opportunity in the real estate market, offering a unique blend of stability and growth potential. These standalone residential properties, rented out to tenants, provide investors with a tangible asset that generates steady income while potentially appreciating in value over time.

As the demand for single-family homes continues to rise among renters seeking more space and privacy, SFRs have become an increasingly attractive option for both individual and institutional investors looking to diversify their portfolios.

The acronym IDEAL encapsulates the primary benefits that make SFRs an attractive investment vehicle:

Income – SFRs provide a steady stream of rental income, offering investors a reliable cash flow. Unlike some other real estate investments, single-family homes tend to attract long-term tenants, resulting in more stable and consistent rental income. This regular cash flow can help offset mortgage payments, property taxes, and maintenance costs while potentially providing additional profit.

Depreciation – One of the significant tax advantages of investing in SFRs is depreciation. The IRS allows property owners to deduct the cost of the building over its useful life, typically 27.5 years for residential properties. This non-cash expense can significantly reduce an investor’s taxable income, potentially leading to substantial tax savings.

Equity – As tenants pay rent, a portion of that money goes towards paying down the mortgage principal, building equity in the property. Over time, this equity accumulation can represent a significant portion of the investment’s return. Additionally, as property values appreciate, the equity in the home increases, further enhancing the investor’s wealth.

Appreciation – Real estate, including single-family homes, has historically appreciated in value over the long term. This appreciation can lead to substantial gains when the property is eventually sold. SFRs in desirable neighborhoods or growing markets may experience even higher rates of appreciation, potentially outperforming other types of real estate investments.

Homes in the United States have appreciated an average of 5.56% per year for the past 60 years.

Leverage – Investors can use leverage to purchase SFRs with a relatively small down payment, typically 20-25% of the property’s value. This allows investors to control a valuable asset with a fraction of its total cost, amplifying potential returns. As the property appreciates and the mortgage is paid down, the investor’s return on investment can be significantly higher than the initial cash invested.

Single-family rentals offer a unique combination of these IDEAL factors, making them a superior investment alternative for many reasons, especially for individuals.

• Lower barrier to entry compared to multi-family or commercial properties
• Easier management and maintenance than larger rental complexes
• Appeal to a wide range of tenants, from young families to retirees
• Potential for higher appreciation rates in desirable neighborhoods
• Flexibility to sell to either investors or owner-occupants when exiting the investment

By leveraging the IDEAL elements of income, depreciation, equity, appreciation, and leverage, investors in single-family rentals can build long-term wealth while enjoying the benefits of passive income and tax advantages. As with any investment, it’s crucial to conduct thorough research and due diligence before committing to a property, considering factors such as location, market trends, and potential rental income.

For more information on Single-family rentals, download our Rental Income Properties guide. We welcome the opportunity to meet with you and explain more about the opportunities that make SFRs such an attractive investment.

The real estate landscape is shifting, with new practices like mandatory buyer’s agreements becoming the norm. While these agreements aim to provide clarity and protection, they can also create unexpected complications.

Imagine signing a buyer’s agreement with an agent, then stumbling upon your dream home during a casual open house visit. This seemingly innocent scenario could lead to a costly mistake, potentially leaving you on the hook for thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket fees.

As the industry evolves, it’s crucial for homebuyers to understand the implications of these agreements and the potential pitfalls of going solo after signing one.

Contacting Listing Agents Directly

Visiting open houses on your own or calling the listing agent is a quick way to discover information and what you like and dislike. Be sure to register with the host agent and inform them if you are currently working with an agent. Keep your excitement in check, as the host agent represents the seller. It’s best to keep your intentions discreet, as anything you say or do can be used against you in negotiations!

Builder Homes

Creating your dream home is an adventure. Many buyers are surprised to learn that a builder’s role is very similar to that of a traditional home seller. Your buyer’s agent will represent you as a buyer and use their expertise to ensure you have the best possible experience and get the best deal. Many builders budget for a buyer’s agent commission regardless of whether you have one, so take advantage of my experience and understanding by following their policies when visiting developments.

For Sale By Owner

If you find a For Sale by Owner property, let your agent know so they can help you maximize the process. They have the expertise to make contact, negotiate, and ensure the entire transaction goes smoothly. Your agent can help you save money in the transaction and, more importantly, save you the headaches of managing the purchase on your own.

Example

When a buyer who has signed a written buyer’s agent agreement contacts another agent, it can lead to a complex situation regarding procuring cause and commission payments. Here’s how it might unfold:

The buyer signs an exclusive buyer’s agent agreement with Agent A, establishing a legal relationship and potentially agreeing to pay a fee for their services.

The buyer then contacts Agent B, perhaps at an open house or through another listing, without informing them about the existing agreement with Agent A. Agent B shows the buyer a property, and the buyer decides to purchase it through Agent B.

A dispute may arise between Agent A and Agent B over who is the procuring cause of the sale. This dispute would typically be resolved through arbitration by the local real estate board.

If Agent B is determined to be the procuring cause (for example, if they showed the property and facilitated the sale), they may be entitled to the selling portion of the commission from the transaction.

However, the buyer may still be liable to pay Agent A’s fee separately, as per their written agreement. This is because the buyer’s agent agreement is a contract between the buyer and Agent A, independent of the outcome of the procuring cause dispute.

In this scenario, the buyer might end up effectively paying two fees: one indirectly through the sale (which goes to Agent B as the procuring cause) and one directly to Agent A as per their agreement.

This situation underscores the importance of clear communication between buyers and agents, and the need for buyers to understand their obligations under a buyer’s agent agreement. It also highlights why agents should always ask potential clients if they’re already working with another agent to avoid such complications.

For more information, download our Buyer’s Agent Guide. You should be comfortable talking with a real estate professional how this works and your available options.